The characterization of Hitler which would have him as a bad guy, responsible for the death of millions, but nonetheless a man with balls who pursued his ends with an iron will is not only ethically repulsive, it is also simply wrong: no, Hitler did not ‘have the balls’ really to change things. All his actions were fundamentally reactions: he acted so that nothing would really change; he acted to prevent the Communist threat of a real change. His targeting of the Jews was ultimately an act of displacement in which he avoided the real enemy—the core of capitalist social relations themselves. Hitler staged a spectacle of Revolution so that the capitalist order could survive – in contrast to Gandhi whose movement effectively endeavored to interrupt the basic functioning of the British colonial state.
Hitler por Slavoj Žižek

(via calvitron)

sandorkrasna:

-Nuestras cosas de la #acampadabcn, en el lugar donde las han “guardado” en Montjuic -

sandorkrasna:

-Nuestras cosas de la #acampadabcn, en el lugar donde las han “guardado” en Montjuic -

(via xsasitahx)

PUNSET A LOS INDIGNADOS: “ESTÁIS INICIANDO UNA RUTA NUEVA. NO PARÉIS” DRY OVIEDO 25 MAYO 2011 (by leandresp)

La Opinión de Gabilondo: “Por fin han hablado los bancos” (by cuatro)

twitter.com/trixxops

view archive



Ask me anything

Submit